Rent vs Buy
Is buying a home in the UK really better than renting and investing the difference? This calculator compares net wealth across both paths — accounting for stamp duty, deposit opportunity cost, mortgage interest, maintenance costs and realistic house price growth assumptions.
Which leaves you better off?
Net wealth over time Buying Renting
Full breakdown
Buying scenario
| Total mortgage paid | — |
| Total maintenance (1% p.a.) | — |
| Upfront costs (SDLT + fees) | — |
| Property value at end | — |
| Remaining mortgage | — |
| Net equity (buying) | — |
Renting scenario
| Total rent paid | — |
| Invested pot value at end | — |
| Net wealth (renting) | — |
Important assumptions & limitations
- Uses standard England SDLT rates — not first-time buyer relief or second home surcharge.
- Maintenance estimated at 1% of property value per year, applied as a fixed amount.
- Does not model mortgage deal switches, remortgaging costs or early repayment charges.
- House price growth and investment return assumptions have an outsized effect over long periods — a 1% difference over 25 years can shift the result by tens of thousands.
- Does not account for rental void periods or letting agent fees.
Rent vs buy: the honest analysis
The UK has a deep cultural bias towards homeownership. "Renting is throwing money away" is one of the most repeated pieces of financial advice in the country — and one of the most misleading. Whether buying or renting is better for your wealth depends on a set of assumptions that most people never think to question.
The real cost of buying
When you buy a property, the upfront costs alone are substantial. Stamp Duty Land Tax on a £350,000 home under standard rates is £7,500. Add £2,000 in legal fees and £800 for a survey and you've spent over £10,000 before you've made a single mortgage payment. These costs are gone immediately — you'd need house prices to rise just to recover them.
Then there's ongoing maintenance. Research consistently suggests homeowners should budget 1–2% of property value per year for repairs, redecoration and capital expenditure. On a £350,000 home that's £3,500–£7,000 per year — costs that renters largely avoid.
Why renting isn't "throwing money away"
Rent buys you somewhere to live. So does a mortgage payment — but the interest portion of a mortgage payment is also "gone forever", just like rent. In the early years of a repayment mortgage, the vast majority of each monthly payment is interest. On a £280,000 mortgage at 4.5%, roughly £1,050 of your first monthly payment is interest and only around £340 reduces the debt.
Renters also retain financial flexibility. They're not exposed to a single illiquid asset. A renter with a deposit invested in a diversified portfolio maintains liquidity, geographical flexibility and avoids the concentration risk of having most of their wealth tied up in one property.
Deposit opportunity cost — the number that changes everything
A £70,000 deposit invested in a diversified index fund returning 7% per year grows to approximately £275,000 over 25 years. That's the opportunity cost of using it as a deposit. This calculator models this directly: the renter invests the deposit plus all upfront costs they avoid (SDLT, legal fees, survey), and the total grows at the investment return rate you specify.
This doesn't mean renting always wins — house price growth can also compound powerfully over 25 years. But it does mean the comparison is far closer than the "renting is wasted money" narrative suggests.
What makes buying win
Buying tends to win when: house price growth significantly outpaces investment returns; you stay in the property for a long time (spreading the upfront costs); mortgage costs are close to or below equivalent rent; and the property is in an area with strong long-term price appreciation. High house price growth is the dominant variable — when property rises at 5–6% annually while investments return 7%, the numbers are close.
What makes renting win
Renting tends to win when: investment returns significantly outperform house price growth; you'd only stay for a short period; the rent-to-price ratio is favourable (low rent relative to property values); or when you factor in the drag from high upfront costs, maintenance and mortgage interest. Over short time horizons of 5–10 years, the upfront costs of buying can be hard to recover.
The assumptions that matter most
The single biggest driver of the outcome is the spread between house price growth and investment returns. Change either by 1% and the result shifts dramatically over 25 years. This calculator lets you adjust both — we'd encourage you to run it with pessimistic, central and optimistic assumptions for each scenario to understand the range of possible outcomes. No one knows what house prices or stock markets will do over the next 25 years.
What this calculator doesn't model
This is a simplified comparison. It doesn't account for: capital gains tax on an investment portfolio (though your ISA allowance helps significantly); the emotional value of owning your home; the risk of being asked to leave a rented property; letting agent fees or service charges; or the benefit of forced savings that a mortgage repayment creates for people who wouldn't otherwise save. These are real factors worth considering alongside the numbers.
Explore more free Property calculators
Mortgage affordability, overpayment, stamp duty, BTL yield, rent vs buy and more — 8 property calculators.